ACLS review: Acute Coronary Syndromes Part 7
Unfractionated Heparin
Unfractionated Heparin Disadvantages
Unfractionated Heparin dosage
Unfractionated Heparin precautions
Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin UA/NSTEMI
Note: It is reasonable to administer enoxaparin in both the prehospital and hospital setting for a patient undergoing fibrinolysis
· Prevents thrombus formation over ruptured plaque surface
· Prevents recurrence of thrombosis
· Maintains patency of infarct-related artery
· Prevent mural thrombus formation in patients with large infarctions
· Need for IV administration
· Frequent monitoring of aPTT
· Unpredictable anticoagulant response patients
· May stimulate platelet activation, causing thrombocytopenia.
· Initial bolus 60u/kg IV (maximum bolus: 4000 units)
· Maintenance 12u/kg/hr
· Keep PTT 1.5-2.0 times higher than control
· Check PTT 3 hours after bolus then every 6 hours until stable then daily
· Follow institutional heparin protocol
· Active bleeding
· Recent intracranial, intraspinal , eye surgery
· Severe hypertension
· Bleeding disorders
· GI bleeding
· Enoxaparin: similar or improved composite outcomes when enoxaparin was administered instead of UFH with non-ST-segment elevation ACS
· Fondaparinux: similar or improved outcomes without increased bleeding risks when fondaparinux was administered in-hospital rather than UFH in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.
· Bivalirudin: No difference in outcome when compared to UFH in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS
Note: Improved composite outcomes as evidenced by death, MI, and/or recurrent angina or recurrent ischemia or revascularization
Enoxaparin: had an increase in the proportion of patients with minor bleeding complications
Fondaparinux: was associated with increased risk of catheter thrombosis in PCI
Bivalirudin: less bleeding risk was observed and no renal dosing is required.
Circulation. 2010; 122: S787-S817 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971028
Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin STEMI
· Enoxaparin: improved outcomes when given instead of UFH to patients with STEMI undergoing fibrinolysis.
· Fondaparinux: superiority in clinical outcomes when compared to UFH in patients treated with fibrinolysis.
· Insufficient evidence to recommend bivalirudin, nadroparin, reviparin, or parnaparin for use in STEMI patients undergoing fibrinolysis.
Fondaparinux may be considered in the hospital for patients treated specifically with non-fibrin-specific thrombolytics
Circulation. 2010; 122: S787-S817 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971028
Comments
Post a Comment